JPA
-
LocalEntityManagerFactoryBean:用于简单部署环境,仅使用 JPA 进行数据访问,受到功能限制最大。
-
从 JNDI 中获取 EntityManagerFactory:用于部署到 Jakarta EE 服务器中,允许从 JNDI 获取 EntityManagerFactory,使用标准的 Jakarta EE 引导。
-
LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean:用于完整 JPA 功能,允许获取 EntityManagerFactory,完全控制其配置,支持与现有 JDBC 配置的链接,本地和全局事务,但对运行时环境和类加载器有要求。
Spring JPA(可在 org.springframework.orm.jpa
包下获取)以类似于与 Hibernate 集成的方式提供对 Java Persistence
API 的全面支持,同时了解底层实现以提供其他功能。
The Spring JPA, available under the org.springframework.orm.jpa
package, offers
comprehensive support for the
Java Persistence
API in a manner similar to the integration with Hibernate while being aware of
the underlying implementation in order to provide additional features.
Three Options for JPA Setup in a Spring Environment
Spring JPA 支持提供三种方法来设置 JPA EntityManagerFactory
,应用程序使用它获取实体管理器。
The Spring JPA support offers three ways of setting up the JPA EntityManagerFactory
that is used by the application to obtain an entity manager.
Using LocalEntityManagerFactoryBean
你只能在简单的部署环境中使用此选项,例如独立应用程序和集成测试。
You can use this option only in simple deployment environments such as stand-alone applications and integration tests.
LocalEntityManagerFactoryBean
会创建一个适合简单部署环境的 EntityManagerFactory
,在这些环境中应用程序仅使用 JPA 进行数据访问。工厂 Bean 使用 JPA PersistenceProvider
自动检测机制(根据 JPA 的 Java SE 引导),在大多数情况下,它只需要你指定持久单元名称。以下 XML 示例配置了这样的 Bean:
The LocalEntityManagerFactoryBean
creates an EntityManagerFactory
suitable for
simple deployment environments where the application uses only JPA for data access.
The factory bean uses the JPA PersistenceProvider
auto-detection mechanism (according
to JPA’s Java SE bootstrapping) and, in most cases, requires you to specify only the
persistence unit name. The following XML example configures such a bean:
<beans>
<bean id="myEmf" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalEntityManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="persistenceUnitName" value="myPersistenceUnit"/>
</bean>
</beans>
这种形式的 JPA 部署是最简单且受限最大的。你无法引用现有的 JDBC DataSource
Bean 定义,也不支持全局事务。此外,持久类的编译(字节码转换)是特定于提供者的,通常需要在启动时指定特定的 JVM 代理。此选项仅适用于独立应用程序和测试环境,JPA 规范为此而设计。
This form of JPA deployment is the simplest and the most limited. You cannot refer to an
existing JDBC DataSource
bean definition, and no support for global transactions
exists. Furthermore, weaving (byte-code transformation) of persistent classes is
provider-specific, often requiring a specific JVM agent to be specified on startup. This
option is sufficient only for stand-alone applications and test environments, for which
the JPA specification is designed.
Obtaining an EntityManagerFactory from JNDI
在部署到 Jakarta EE 服务器时可以使用此选项。查看服务器文档,了解如何将自定义 JPA 提供者部署到服务器中,允许使用与服务器默认值不同的提供者。
You can use this option when deploying to a Jakarta EE server. Check your server’s documentation on how to deploy a custom JPA provider into your server, allowing for a different provider than the server’s default.
从 JNDI 获取 EntityManagerFactory
(例如在 Jakarta EE 环境中),是一个修改 XML 配置的问题,如以下示例所示:
Obtaining an EntityManagerFactory
from JNDI (for example in a Jakarta EE environment),
is a matter of changing the XML configuration, as the following example shows:
<beans>
<jee:jndi-lookup id="myEmf" jndi-name="persistence/myPersistenceUnit"/>
</beans>
此操作假设标准 Jakarta EE 引导。Jakarta EE 服务器自动检测持久单元(实际上是应用程序 jar 文件中的 META-INF/persistence.xml
文件)和 Jakarta EE 部署描述符(例如 web.xml
)中的 persistence-unit-ref
项,并为这些持久单元定义环境命名上下文位置。
This action assumes standard Jakarta EE bootstrapping. The Jakarta EE server auto-detects
persistence units (in effect, META-INF/persistence.xml
files in application jars) and
persistence-unit-ref
entries in the Jakarta EE deployment descriptor (for example,
web.xml
) and defines environment naming context locations for those persistence units.
在此场景中,整个持久单元部署,包括持久类的编译(字节码转换),都是由 Jakarta EE 服务器完成的。JDBC DataSource
通过 META-INF/persistence.xml
文件中的 JNDI 位置来定义。EntityManager
事务与服务器的 JTA 子系统集成。Spring 只使用获取的 EntityManagerFactory
,通过依赖注入将其传递给应用程序对象,并管理持久单元的事务(通常通过 JtaTransactionManager
)。
In such a scenario, the entire persistence unit deployment, including the weaving
(byte-code transformation) of persistent classes, is up to the Jakarta EE server. The JDBC
DataSource
is defined through a JNDI location in the META-INF/persistence.xml
file.
EntityManager
transactions are integrated with the server’s JTA subsystem. Spring merely
uses the obtained EntityManagerFactory
, passing it on to application objects through
dependency injection and managing transactions for the persistence unit (typically
through JtaTransactionManager
).
如果在同一个应用程序中使用多个持久单元,则从 JNDI 检索到的这些持久单元的 Bean 名称应该与应用程序用来引用它们的持久单元名称相匹配(例如,@PersistenceUnit
和 @PersistenceContext
注释)。
If you use multiple persistence units in the same application, the bean names of such
JNDI-retrieved persistence units should match the persistence unit names that the
application uses to refer to them (for example, in @PersistenceUnit
and
@PersistenceContext
annotations).
Using LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
你可以在基于 Spring 的应用程序环境中使用此选项来获得完整的 JPA 功能。这包括 Web 容器(例如 Tomcat)、独立应用程序以及具有复杂持久性要求的集成测试。
You can use this option for full JPA capabilities in a Spring-based application environment. This includes web containers such as Tomcat, stand-alone applications, and integration tests with sophisticated persistence requirements.
LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
可以完全控制 EntityManagerFactory
的配置,适用于需要细粒度自定义的环境。LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
基于 persistence.xml
文件、提供的 dataSourceLookup
策略以及指定的 loadTimeWeaver
创建一个 PersistenceUnitInfo
实例。这样,就可以与 JNDI 之外的自定义数据源配合使用并控制编译过程。以下示例展示了 LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
的典型 Bean 定义:
The LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
gives full control over
EntityManagerFactory
configuration and is appropriate for environments where
fine-grained customization is required. The LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
creates a PersistenceUnitInfo
instance based on the persistence.xml
file, the
supplied dataSourceLookup
strategy, and the specified loadTimeWeaver
. It is, thus,
possible to work with custom data sources outside of JNDI and to control the weaving
process. The following example shows a typical bean definition for a
LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
:
<beans>
<bean id="myEmf" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="dataSource" ref="someDataSource"/>
<property name="loadTimeWeaver">
<bean class="org.springframework.instrument.classloading.InstrumentationLoadTimeWeaver"/>
</property>
</bean>
</beans>
以下示例展示了典型的 persistence.xml
文件:
The following example shows a typical persistence.xml
file:
<persistence xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence" version="1.0">
<persistence-unit name="myUnit" transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL">
<mapping-file>META-INF/orm.xml</mapping-file>
<exclude-unlisted-classes/>
</persistence-unit>
</persistence>
|
The |
使用 LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
是最强大的 JPA 设置选项,允许在应用程序中进行灵活的本地配置。它支持与现有 JDBC DataSource
的链接,支持本地和全局事务,等等。但是,它也对运行时环境提出要求,例如,如果持久性提供程序要求字节码转换,则需要具有编译支持的类加载器。
Using the LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
is the most powerful JPA setup
option, allowing for flexible local configuration within the application. It supports
links to an existing JDBC DataSource
, supports both local and global transactions, and
so on. However, it also imposes requirements on the runtime environment, such as the
availability of a weaving-capable class loader if the persistence provider demands
byte-code transformation.
此选项可能与 Jakarta EE 服务器的内置 JPA 功能相冲突。在完整的 Jakarta EE 环境中,考虑从 JNDI 获取 EntityManagerFactory
。或者,在 LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
定义(例如 META-INF/my-persistence.xml
)上指定一个自定义 persistenceXmlLocation
,并在应用程序 jar 文件中只包含带有该名称的描述符。由于 Jakarta EE 服务器只查找默认的 META-INF/persistence.xml
文件,因此它会忽略此类自定义持久单元,从而避免了与 Spring 驱动的 JPA 设置的冲突(例如,适用于 Resin 3.1)。
This option may conflict with the built-in JPA capabilities of a Jakarta EE server. In a
full Jakarta EE environment, consider obtaining your EntityManagerFactory
from JNDI.
Alternatively, specify a custom persistenceXmlLocation
on your
LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
definition (for example,
META-INF/my-persistence.xml) and include only a descriptor with that name in your
application jar files. Because the Jakarta EE server looks only for default
META-INF/persistence.xml
files, it ignores such custom persistence units and, hence,
avoids conflicts with a Spring-driven JPA setup upfront. (This applies to Resin 3.1, for
example.)
并非所有 JPA 提供程序都需要 JVM 代理。Hibernate 就是一个不需要代理的例子。如果你的提供程序不需要代理,或者你有其他备选方案,例如通过自定义编译器或 Ant 任务在构建时应用增强,则不应使用加载时编译器。
Not all JPA providers require a JVM agent. Hibernate is an example of one that does not. If your provider does not require an agent or you have other alternatives, such as applying enhancements at build time through a custom compiler or an Ant task, you should not use the load-time weaver.
LoadTimeWeaver
接口是 Spring 提供的类,它以特定方式插入 JPA ClassTransformer
实例,这取决于环境是 Web 容器还是应用程序服务器。通过一个 代理结合 ClassTransformers
通常效率不高。代理对整个虚拟机起作用并且检查加载的每个类,这在生产服务器环境中通常不受欢迎。
The LoadTimeWeaver
interface is a Spring-provided class that lets JPA
ClassTransformer
instances be plugged in a specific manner, depending on whether the
environment is a web container or application server. Hooking ClassTransformers
through an
agent
is typically not efficient. The agents work against the entire virtual machine and
inspect every class that is loaded, which is usually undesirable in a production
server environment.
Spring 为各种环境提供多种 LoadTimeWeaver
实现,让 ClassTransformer
实例只针对每个类加载器应用,而不是每个虚拟机。
Spring provides a number of LoadTimeWeaver
implementations for various environments,
letting ClassTransformer
instances be applied only for each class loader and not
for each VM.
请参见 AOP 章节中的 Spring configuration 了解更多关于 LoadTimeWeaver
实现及其设置方面的信息,无论是通用设置还是针对各种平台(如 Tomcat、JBoss 和 WebSphere)的自定义设置。
See the Spring configuration in the AOP chapter for
more insight regarding the LoadTimeWeaver
implementations and their setup, either
generic or customized to various platforms (such as Tomcat, JBoss and WebSphere).
如 Spring configuration 中所述,您可以使用 @EnableLoadTimeWeaving
注解或 context:load-time-weaver
XML 元素配置一个上下文范围的 LoadTimeWeaver
。所有 JPA LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
实例都会自动选取这样的全局 weaver。以下示例展示了设置一个加载时 weaver 的首选方式,它自动检测平台(如 Tomcat 的支持 weaving 的类加载器或 Spring 的 JVM 代理)和自动将 weaver 传播到所有支持 weaver 的 bean:
As described in Spring configuration, you can configure
a context-wide LoadTimeWeaver
by using the @EnableLoadTimeWeaving
annotation or the
context:load-time-weaver
XML element. Such a global weaver is automatically picked up
by all JPA LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
instances. The following example
shows the preferred way of setting up a load-time weaver, delivering auto-detection
of the platform (e.g. Tomcat’s weaving-capable class loader or Spring’s JVM agent)
and automatic propagation of the weaver to all weaver-aware beans:
<context:load-time-weaver/>
<bean id="emf" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
...
</bean>
但是,如有需要,您可以像以下示例所示,通过 loadTimeWeaver
属性手动指定专用的织入器:
However, you can, if needed, manually specify a dedicated weaver through the
loadTimeWeaver
property, as the following example shows:
<bean id="emf" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="loadTimeWeaver">
<bean class="org.springframework.instrument.classloading.ReflectiveLoadTimeWeaver"/>
</property>
</bean>
无论如何配置 LTW,通过使用此技术,依赖于检测的 JPA 应用程序可以在目标平台(例如 Tomcat)中运行,而不需要代理。当托管应用程序依赖于不同的 JPA 实现时,这一点尤其重要,因为 JPA 转换器仅在类加载器级别上应用,因此彼此隔离。
No matter how the LTW is configured, by using this technique, JPA applications relying on instrumentation can run in the target platform (for example, Tomcat) without needing an agent. This is especially important when the hosting applications rely on different JPA implementations, because the JPA transformers are applied only at the class-loader level and are, thus, isolated from each other.
Dealing with Multiple Persistence Units
对于依赖于多个持久性单元位置(例如存储在类路径中的各种 JAR 中)的应用程序,Spring 提供了 PersistenceUnitManager
作为中央存储库,以避免持久性单元发现过程,该过程可能是昂贵的。默认实现允许指定多个位置。这些位置将被解析,稍后通过持久性单元名称进行检索。(默认情况下,类路径被搜索 META-INF/persistence.xml
文件。)以下示例配置了多个位置:
For applications that rely on multiple persistence units locations (stored in various
JARS in the classpath, for example), Spring offers the PersistenceUnitManager
to act as
a central repository and to avoid the persistence units discovery process, which can be
expensive. The default implementation lets multiple locations be specified. These locations are
parsed and later retrieved through the persistence unit name. (By default, the classpath
is searched for META-INF/persistence.xml
files.) The following example configures
multiple locations:
<bean id="pum" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.persistenceunit.DefaultPersistenceUnitManager">
<property name="persistenceXmlLocations">
<list>
<value>org/springframework/orm/jpa/domain/persistence-multi.xml</value>
<value>classpath:/my/package/**/custom-persistence.xml</value>
<value>classpath*:META-INF/persistence.xml</value>
</list>
</property>
<property name="dataSources">
<map>
<entry key="localDataSource" value-ref="local-db"/>
<entry key="remoteDataSource" value-ref="remote-db"/>
</map>
</property>
<!-- if no datasource is specified, use this one -->
<property name="defaultDataSource" ref="remoteDataSource"/>
</bean>
<bean id="emf" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="persistenceUnitManager" ref="pum"/>
<property name="persistenceUnitName" value="myCustomUnit"/>
</bean>
默认实现允许自定义 PersistenceUnitInfo
实例(在将它们馈送到 JPA 提供程序之前),可以通过声明方式(通过其属性,影响所有托管单元)或编程方式(通过 PersistenceUnitPostProcessor
,它允许持久性单元选择)。如果未指定 PersistenceUnitManager
,则由 LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
创建一个并内部使用该管理器。
The default implementation allows customization of the PersistenceUnitInfo
instances
(before they are fed to the JPA provider) either declaratively (through its properties, which
affect all hosted units) or programmatically (through the
PersistenceUnitPostProcessor
, which allows persistence unit selection). If no
PersistenceUnitManager
is specified, one is created and used internally by
LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
.
Background Bootstrapping
LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
支持通过 bootstrapExecutor
属性进行后台引导,如下面的示例所示:
LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
supports background bootstrapping through
the bootstrapExecutor
property, as the following example shows:
<bean id="emf" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="bootstrapExecutor">
<bean class="org.springframework.core.task.SimpleAsyncTaskExecutor"/>
</property>
</bean>
将实际的 JPA 提供程序引导转交给指定的执行器,然后与应用程序引导线程并行运行。公开的 EntityManagerFactory
代理可以注入到其他应用程序组件中,甚至可以响应 EntityManagerFactoryInfo
配置检查。但是,一旦其他组件访问了实际的 JPA 提供程序(例如调用 createEntityManager
),这些调用会阻塞,直到后台引导完成。特别是,当您使用 Spring Data JPA 时,请确保也为其存储库设置延迟引导。
The actual JPA provider bootstrapping is handed off to the specified executor and then,
running in parallel, to the application bootstrap thread. The exposed EntityManagerFactory
proxy can be injected into other application components and is even able to respond to
EntityManagerFactoryInfo
configuration inspection. However, once the actual JPA provider
is being accessed by other components (for example, calling createEntityManager
), those
calls block until the background bootstrapping has completed. In particular, when you use
Spring Data JPA, make sure to set up deferred bootstrapping for its repositories as well.
从 6.2 开始,在上下文刷新完成之前强制执行 JPA 初始化,等待异步引导在此之前完成。这使完全初始化的数据库基础结构的可用性变得可预测,并允许在 ContextRefreshedEvent
侦听器等中进行自定义后初始化逻辑。不建议将此类应用程序级的数据库初始化放入 @PostConstruct
方法或类似方法中;最好将其放在 Lifecycle.start
中(如果适用)或 ContextRefreshedEvent
侦听器中。
As of 6.2, JPA initialization is enforced before context refresh completion, waiting for
asynchronous bootstrapping to complete by then. This makes the availability of the fully
initialized database infrastructure predictable and allows for custom post-initialization
logic in ContextRefreshedEvent
listeners etc. Putting such application-level database
initialization into @PostConstruct
methods or the like is not recommended; this is
better placed in Lifecycle.start
(if applicable) or a ContextRefreshedEvent
listener.
Implementing DAOs Based on JPA: EntityManagerFactory
and EntityManager
尽管 |
Although |
可以通过使用注入的 EntityManagerFactory
或 EntityManager
编写针对普通 JPA 的代码,而无需任何 Spring 依赖项。如果启用了 PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
,Spring 可以理解 @PersistenceUnit
和 @PersistenceContext
注释,这些注释位于字段和方法级别。下面的示例展示了一个使用 @PersistenceUnit
注释的普通 JPA DAO 实现:
It is possible to write code against the plain JPA without any Spring dependencies, by
using an injected EntityManagerFactory
or EntityManager
. Spring can understand the
@PersistenceUnit
and @PersistenceContext
annotations both at the field and the method
level if a PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
is enabled. The following example
shows a plain JPA DAO implementation that uses the @PersistenceUnit
annotation:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
public class ProductDaoImpl implements ProductDao {
private EntityManagerFactory emf;
@PersistenceUnit
public void setEntityManagerFactory(EntityManagerFactory emf) {
this.emf = emf;
}
public Collection loadProductsByCategory(String category) {
EntityManager em = this.emf.createEntityManager();
try {
Query query = em.createQuery("from Product as p where p.category = ?1");
query.setParameter(1, category);
return query.getResultList();
}
finally {
if (em != null) {
em.close();
}
}
}
}
class ProductDaoImpl : ProductDao {
private lateinit var emf: EntityManagerFactory
@PersistenceUnit
fun setEntityManagerFactory(emf: EntityManagerFactory) {
this.emf = emf
}
fun loadProductsByCategory(category: String): Collection<*> {
val em = this.emf.createEntityManager()
val query = em.createQuery("from Product as p where p.category = ?1");
query.setParameter(1, category);
return query.resultList;
}
}
前面的 DAO 并不依赖于 Spring,但仍然很好地适应 Spring 应用程序上下文。此外,DAO 利用注释需要注入默认 EntityManagerFactory
,如下面的示例 bean 定义所示:
The preceding DAO has no dependency on Spring and still fits nicely into a Spring
application context. Moreover, the DAO takes advantage of annotations to require the
injection of the default EntityManagerFactory
, as the following example bean definition shows:
<beans>
<!-- bean post-processor for JPA annotations -->
<bean class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.support.PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor"/>
<bean id="myProductDao" class="product.ProductDaoImpl"/>
</beans>
作为显式定义 PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
的替代方法,请考虑在应用程序上下文配置中使用 Spring context:annotation-config
XML 元素。这样做会自动注册所有基于注释配置的 Spring 标准后处理器,包括 CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
等。
As an alternative to explicitly defining a PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
,
consider using the Spring context:annotation-config
XML element in your application
context configuration. Doing so automatically registers all Spring standard
post-processors for annotation-based configuration, including
CommonAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
and so on.
请考虑以下示例:
Consider the following example:
<beans>
<!-- post-processors for all standard config annotations -->
<context:annotation-config/>
<bean id="myProductDao" class="product.ProductDaoImpl"/>
</beans>
这种 DAO 的主要问题在于它总是通过工厂创建一个新的 EntityManager
。您可以通过请求一个事务性的 EntityManager
(也称为“共享 EntityManager”,因为它是一个用于实际事务性 EntityManager 的共享的、线程安全的代理)来避免这种情况,而不是注入工厂。下面的示例展示了如何执行此操作:
The main problem with such a DAO is that it always creates a new EntityManager
through
the factory. You can avoid this by requesting a transactional EntityManager
(also called a
“shared EntityManager” because it is a shared, thread-safe proxy for the actual transactional
EntityManager) to be injected instead of the factory. The following example shows how to do so:
-
Java
-
Kotlin
public class ProductDaoImpl implements ProductDao {
@PersistenceContext
private EntityManager em;
public Collection loadProductsByCategory(String category) {
Query query = em.createQuery("from Product as p where p.category = :category");
query.setParameter("category", category);
return query.getResultList();
}
}
class ProductDaoImpl : ProductDao {
@PersistenceContext
private lateinit var em: EntityManager
fun loadProductsByCategory(category: String): Collection<*> {
val query = em.createQuery("from Product as p where p.category = :category")
query.setParameter("category", category)
return query.resultList
}
}
@PersistenceContext
注释有一个可选属性叫做 type
,它默认值为 PersistenceContextType.TRANSACTION
。您可以使用此默认值接收共享 EntityManager
代理。替代值 PersistenceContextType.EXTENDED
是一种完全不同的事务。这会导致一个所谓的扩展 EntityManager
,它不是线程安全的,因此不能在并发访问的组件中使用,例如 Spring 管理的单例 bean。扩展 EntityManager
实例只应在有状态组件中使用,例如驻留在会话中的组件,其中 EntityManager
的生命周期不绑定到当前事务,而是完全取决于应用程序。
The @PersistenceContext
annotation has an optional attribute called type
, which defaults
to PersistenceContextType.TRANSACTION
. You can use this default to receive a shared
EntityManager
proxy. The alternative, PersistenceContextType.EXTENDED
, is a completely
different affair. This results in a so-called extended EntityManager
, which is not
thread-safe and, hence, must not be used in a concurrently accessed component, such as a
Spring-managed singleton bean. Extended EntityManager
instances are only supposed to be used
in stateful components that, for example, reside in a session, with the lifecycle of the
EntityManager
not tied to a current transaction but rather being completely up to the
application.
您可以在类中的字段或方法上应用指示依赖项注入的注释(例如 @PersistenceUnit
和 @PersistenceContext
)— 因此,表达式“方法级注入”和“字段级注入”。字段级注释简洁且易于使用,而方法级注释允许对注入的依赖项进行进一步处理。在这两种情况下,成员可见性(公共、受保护或私有)都不重要。
You can apply annotations that indicate dependency injections (such as @PersistenceUnit
and @PersistenceContext
) on field or methods inside a class — hence the expressions
“method-level injection” and “field-level injection”. Field-level annotations are
concise and easier to use while method-level annotations allow for further processing of the
injected dependency. In both cases, the member visibility (public, protected, or private)
does not matter.
类级别的注释呢?
What about class-level annotations?
在 Jakarta EE 平台上,它们用于依赖项声明,而不是用于资源注入。
On the Jakarta EE platform, they are used for dependency declaration and not for resource injection.
注入的 EntityManager
是 Spring 管理的(知道正在进行的事务)。即使新的 DAO 实现使用 EntityManager
而不是 EntityManagerFactory
的方法级注入,但由于使用注释,因此无需更改 bean 定义。
The injected EntityManager
is Spring-managed (aware of the ongoing transaction).
Even though the new DAO implementation uses method-level injection of an EntityManager
instead of an EntityManagerFactory
, no change is required in the bean definition
due to annotation usage.
此 DAO 样式的主要优点是它仅依赖于 Java 持久性 API。不需要导入任何 Spring 类。此外,由于了解 JPA 注释,因此 Spring 容器会自动应用注入项。这从非侵入性的角度来看很有吸引力,并且对 JPA 开发人员来说感觉更自然。
The main advantage of this DAO style is that it depends only on the Java Persistence API. No import of any Spring class is required. Moreover, as the JPA annotations are understood, the injections are applied automatically by the Spring container. This is appealing from a non-invasiveness perspective and can feel more natural to JPA developers.
Implementing DAOs Based on @Autowired
(typically with constructor-based injection)
@PersistenceUnit
和 @PersistenceContext
只能声明在方法和字段上。如何通过构造函数和其他 @Autowired
注入点提供 JPA 资源?
@PersistenceUnit
and @PersistenceContext
can only be declared on methods and fields.
What about providing JPA resources via constructors and other @Autowired
injection points?
只要目标被定义为一个 bean(例如通过 LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
),就可以通过构造函数和 @Autowired
字段/方法轻松地注入 EntityManagerFactory
。注入点按原样与原始 EntityManagerFactory
定义的类型匹配。
EntityManagerFactory
can easily be injected via constructors and @Autowired
fields/methods
as long as the target is defined as a bean, e.g. via LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
.
The injection point matches the original EntityManagerFactory
definition by type as-is.
但是,默认情况下,@PersistenceContext
样式的共享 EntityManager
引用不可用于常规依赖项注入。为了使其可用于 @Autowired
要求的基于类型的匹配,请考虑定义一个 SharedEntityManagerBean
作为 EntityManagerFactory
定义的伴随组件:
However, an @PersistenceContext
-style shared EntityManager
reference is not available for
regular dependency injection out of the box. In order to make it available for type-based
matching as required by @Autowired
, consider defining a SharedEntityManagerBean
as a
companion for your EntityManagerFactory
definition:
<bean id="emf" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
...
</bean>
<bean id="em" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.support.SharedEntityManagerBean">
<property name="entityManagerFactory" ref="emf"/>
</bean>
或者,您可以基于 SharedEntityManagerCreator
定义一个 @Bean
方法:
Alternatively, you may define an @Bean
method based on SharedEntityManagerCreator
:
@Bean("em")
public static EntityManager sharedEntityManager(EntityManagerFactory emf) {
return SharedEntityManagerCreator.createSharedEntityManager(emf);
}
在存在多个持久化单元的情况下,每个 EntityManagerFactory
定义都需要有相应的 EntityManager
bean 定义,最好使用与不同的 EntityManagerFactory
定义相匹配的限定符,以便通过 @Autowired @Qualifier("…")
区分持久化单元。
In case of multiple persistence units, each EntityManagerFactory
definition needs to be
accompanied by a corresponding EntityManager
bean definition, ideally with qualifiers
that match with the distinct EntityManagerFactory
definition in order to distinguish
the persistence units via @Autowired @Qualifier("…")
.
Spring-driven JPA Transactions
我们强烈建议您阅读 Declarative Transaction Management,如果您还没有这样做,以便更详细地了解 Spring 的声明式事务支持。 |
We strongly encourage you to read Declarative Transaction Management, if you have not already done so, to get more detailed coverage of Spring’s declarative transaction support. |
用于 JPA 的建议策略是通过 JPA 的本机事务支持进行本地事务。Spring 的 JpaTransactionManager
提供了许多已知的本地 JDBC 事务的功能(例如特定事务的隔离级别和资源级只读优化),而无需 JTA 事务协调器和支持 XA 的资源。
The recommended strategy for JPA is local transactions through JPA’s native transaction
support. Spring’s JpaTransactionManager
provides many capabilities known from local
JDBC transactions (such as transaction-specific isolation levels and resource-level
read-only optimizations) against any regular JDBC connection pool, without requiring
a JTA transaction coordinator and XA-capable resources.
Spring JPA 还允许一个已配置的 JpaTransactionManager
将 JPA 事务公开给 JDBC 访问代码,此外,该 JDBC 访问代码会访问相同的 DataSource
,前提是已注册的 JpaDialect
支持检索底层的 JDBC Connection
。Spring 为 EclipseLink 和 Hibernate JPA 实现提供了方言。请参见 next section 了解更多 JpaDialect
细节。
Spring JPA also lets a configured JpaTransactionManager
expose a JPA transaction
to JDBC access code that accesses the same DataSource
, provided that the registered
JpaDialect
supports retrieval of the underlying JDBC Connection
. Spring provides
dialects for the EclipseLink and Hibernate JPA implementations. See the
next section for details on JpaDialect
.
对于实际资源连接的 JTA 样式延迟检索,Spring 为目标连接池提供了相应的 DataSource
代理类:请参阅 LazyConnectionDataSourceProxy
。这对于 JPA 只读事务特别有用,该事务通常可以从本地缓存中进行处理,而不是命中数据库。
For JTA-style lazy retrieval of actual resource connections, Spring provides a
corresponding DataSource
proxy class for the target connection pool: see
LazyConnectionDataSourceProxy
.
This is particularly useful for JPA read-only transactions which can often
be processed from a local cache rather than hitting the database.
Understanding JpaDialect
and JpaVendorAdapter
作为一项高级功能,JpaTransactionManager
和 AbstractEntityManagerFactoryBean
的子类允许将自定义 JpaDialect
传递到 jpaDialect
bean 属性中。JpaDialect
实现通常以特定于供应商的方式启用 Spring 支持的以下高级功能:
As an advanced feature, JpaTransactionManager
and subclasses of
AbstractEntityManagerFactoryBean
allow a custom JpaDialect
to be passed into the
jpaDialect
bean property. A JpaDialect
implementation can enable the following advanced
features supported by Spring, usually in a vendor-specific manner:
-
Applying specific transaction semantics (such as custom isolation level or transaction timeout)
-
Retrieving the transactional JDBC
Connection
(for exposure to JDBC-based DAOs) -
Advanced translation of
PersistenceException
to Spring’sDataAccessException
这对于特殊的的事务语义和高级的异常转换特别有价值。默认实现 (DefaultJpaDialect
) 不提供任何特殊功能,如果需要前面列出的功能,则必须指定适当的方言。
This is particularly valuable for special transaction semantics and for advanced
translation of exception. The default implementation (DefaultJpaDialect
) does
not provide any special abilities and, if the features listed earlier are required, you have
to specify the appropriate dialect.
作为一个最初主要用于 Spring 全功能 |
As an even broader provider adaptation facility primarily for Spring’s full-featured
|
参阅 JpaDialect
和 JpaVendorAdapter
javadoc 以获得更多有关其操作的详细信息以及如何在 Spring 的 JPA 支持中使用它们。
See the JpaDialect
and
JpaVendorAdapter
javadoc for
more details of its operations and how they are used within Spring’s JPA support.
Setting up JPA with JTA Transaction Management
作为 JpaTransactionManager
的替代方法,Spring 还允许通过 JTA 进行多资源事务协调,无论是在 Jakarta EE 环境中还是在独立的事务协调器(如 Atomikos)中。除了选择 Spring 的 JtaTransactionManager
而不是 JpaTransactionManager
之外,您还需要采取一些进一步的步骤:
As an alternative to JpaTransactionManager
, Spring also allows for multi-resource
transaction coordination through JTA, either in a Jakarta EE environment or with a
stand-alone transaction coordinator, such as Atomikos. Aside from choosing Spring’s
JtaTransactionManager
instead of JpaTransactionManager
, you need to take few further
steps:
-
The underlying JDBC connection pools need to be XA-capable and be integrated with your transaction coordinator. This is usually straightforward in a Jakarta EE environment, exposing a different kind of
DataSource
through JNDI. See your application server documentation for details. Analogously, a standalone transaction coordinator usually comes with special XA-integratedDataSource
variants. Again, check its documentation. -
The JPA
EntityManagerFactory
setup needs to be configured for JTA. This is provider-specific, typically through special properties to be specified asjpaProperties
onLocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
. In the case of Hibernate, these properties are even version-specific. See your Hibernate documentation for details. -
Spring’s
HibernateJpaVendorAdapter
enforces certain Spring-oriented defaults, such as the connection release mode,on-close
, which matches Hibernate’s own default in Hibernate 5.0 but not any more in Hibernate 5.1+. For a JTA setup, make sure to declare your persistence unit transaction type as "JTA". Alternatively, set Hibernate 5.2’shibernate.connection.handling_mode
property toDELAYED_ACQUISITION_AND_RELEASE_AFTER_STATEMENT
to restore Hibernate’s own default. See Spurious Application Server Warnings with Hibernate for related notes. -
Alternatively, consider obtaining the
EntityManagerFactory
from your application server itself (that is, through a JNDI lookup instead of a locally declaredLocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
). A server-providedEntityManagerFactory
might require special definitions in your server configuration (making the deployment less portable) but is set up for the server’s JTA environment.
Native Hibernate Setup and Native Hibernate Transactions for JPA Interaction
与 HibernateTransactionManager
结合使用的本机 LocalSessionFactoryBean
设置允许与 @PersistenceContext
和其他 JPA 访问代码进行交互。现在,Hibernate SessionFactory
本机实现了 JPA 的 EntityManagerFactory
接口,Hibernate Session
句柄本机是 JPA EntityManager
。Spring 的 JPA 支持工具会自动检测本机 Hibernate 会话。
A native LocalSessionFactoryBean
setup in combination with HibernateTransactionManager
allows for interaction with @PersistenceContext
and other JPA access code. A Hibernate
SessionFactory
natively implements JPA’s EntityManagerFactory
interface now
and a Hibernate Session
handle natively is a JPA EntityManager
.
Spring’s JPA support facilities automatically detect native Hibernate sessions.
因此,这种本机 Hibernate 设置可以在许多场景中替代标准 JPA LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
和 JpaTransactionManager
组合,允许在同一本地事务中使用 SessionFactory.getCurrentSession()
(以及 HibernateTemplate
)与 @PersistenceContext EntityManager
进行交互。这种设置还提供了更强的 Hibernate 集成和更高的配置灵活性,因为它不受 JPA 引导程序合约的约束。
Such native Hibernate setup can, therefore, serve as a replacement for a standard JPA
LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean
and JpaTransactionManager
combination
in many scenarios, allowing for interaction with SessionFactory.getCurrentSession()
(and also HibernateTemplate
) next to @PersistenceContext EntityManager
within
the same local transaction. Such a setup also provides stronger Hibernate integration
and more configuration flexibility, because it is not constrained by JPA bootstrap contracts.
在这种情况下,您不需要 HibernateJpaVendorAdapter
配置,因为 Spring 的本机 Hibernate 设置提供了更多功能(例如,自定义 Hibernate 集成器设置、Hibernate 5.3 bean 容器集成以及对只读事务的更强大的优化)。最后但并非最不重要的一点,您还可以通过 LocalSessionFactoryBuilder
表达本机 Hibernate 设置,与 @Bean
样式配置无缝集成(不涉及 FactoryBean
)。
You do not need HibernateJpaVendorAdapter
configuration in such a scenario,
since Spring’s native Hibernate setup provides even more features
(for example, custom Hibernate Integrator setup, Hibernate 5.3 bean container integration,
and stronger optimizations for read-only transactions). Last but not least, you can also
express native Hibernate setup through LocalSessionFactoryBuilder
,
seamlessly integrating with @Bean
style configuration (no FactoryBean
involved).
在 On |